Legal Opinion

Eldon's Super Fresh Stores, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 1973No. 43682PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

0. Russell Olson, Justice. *

Plaintiff, drawer of a check payable to defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant. The appeal raises the issue of whether the payee was, as a matter of law, a holder in due course and thus not subject to the drawer’s claim that the check, possession of which it gave to its agent, was wrongfully delivered to defendant-payee in payment of the agent’s own personal obligation to defendant rather than for the benefit of plaintiff-drawer.

Eldon’s Super Fresh Stores, Inc. (hereafter Eldon’s) is a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Drumm Construction Co. v. ForbesIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Pennington County Bank v. First State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Olsen v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Bjorgo v. First National Bank of EmmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Jeanette Frocks, Inc. v. First Produce State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. American Express Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. FARMERS CO-OP. EL., INC., DUNCOMBE v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Shaffer v. Brooklyn Park Garden ApartmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API