Legal Opinion

California Dental Association v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 5, 2000No. 96-70409PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

After affirming our prior judgment in part and reversing in part, the United States Supreme Court remanded this case for a determination of whether the California Dental Association’s advertising restrictions are anticompetitive under rule-of-reason analysis. Having closely examined the record under the rule of reason, we conclude that the Federal Trade Commission failed to prove that the restrictions are anticompetitive. We therefore vacate and remand with instruction that the Commission dismiss its case against the Association.

I

Petitioner, the California…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re WellPoint, Inc. Out-of-Network "UCR" Rates LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
  2. Gerlinger v. Amazon. Com, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  3. United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1776 v. Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Kpmg, LLP v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  5. Paladin Associates, Inc. v. Montana Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API