Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Paladin Associates, Inc. v. Montana Power Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 13, 2003No. 01-35849PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge.

This case involves an array of antitrust law challenges to what we conclude are reasonable and unremarkable business practices. A Montana natural gas marketer sued a Montana natural gas pipeline company for alleged violations of the antitrust laws. The plaintiff marketer claimed that the defendant pipeline company unlawfully monopolized an essential gas pipeline and storage facility in southern Montana, unlawfully tied together the sales of two products, and unlawfully conspired with another natural gas marketer, a competitor of the plaintiff, to organize a group…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. W. Patrick Kenna v. United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1776 v. Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  3. In re Live Concert Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  4. In Re Webkinz Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  5. O'Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API