Legal Opinion
State v. Goforth
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 7, 1989No. 66675PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, Justice.
This case of first impression concerns whether a grandfather, who posts bond for his grandson, is entitled to the same statutory protections as a licensed bondsman. We find the Okla. Const., art. 5, § 46 requires the application of 59 O.S.Supp.1984 § 1332, 1 to licensed and unlicensed bondsmen alike.
FACTS
On November 7, 1985, Orren Thompson/grandfather-appellee, who is not a licensed bail bondsman, posted a $7,000.00 cash bond for the release of Randy Go-forth/(grandson-appellee) pending his grandson’s arraignment on a second degree burglary charge. The terms of the printed…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Maule v. Independent School District No. 9Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Walker v. St. Louissan Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Oklahoma City News Broadcasters Ass'n v. NighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Cox v. DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- City of Bethany v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.