Hugo v. City of Fairbanks
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Judge.
Ellen M. Hugo was convicted of shoplifting, in violation of Fairbanks General Code Ordinance (FGCO) § 6.303(a). 1 The trial court construed the ordinance as not requiring an intent to permanently deprive. Hugo appeals her conviction on the basis that the ordinance requires such an intent. We agree and reverse the conviction.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Hugo is an elderly Eskimo woman from Anaktuvuk Pass. Sometime during the first two weeks of December, 1981, she flew to Fairbanks to be with her hospitalized husband. Hugo had visited Fairbanks occasionally and had often shopped in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Speidel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Kimoktoak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Burford v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. NicholsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- University of Alaska v. ShantiAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BautistaHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.