Burford v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Hal Bur-ford, appeal from their convictions following a joint jury trial in the superior court for the offense of larceny committed in a building. Appellants contend that it was error for the state to use two uncounselled misdemeanor convictions to impeach the credibility of the defendant Hal Burford. 1
Appellants failed to raise this point at the trial court level or include it in their statements of points to be raised on appeal. Generally this will foreclose appeal of the alleged error. 2 Nevertheless, the alleged error may be considered if it reaches the…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Loper v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by50 opinions
- Dorman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Davenport v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Hampton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Thomas v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.