Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. City of Williamsburg

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 18, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clay —

Affirming.

By ordinances duly enacted in the year 1930, the city of Williamsburg ordered the improvement of Third street at the cost of abutting property owners, and the contract .was awarded to the Lewis & Kelly Construction Company. On the completion of the work, the city brought this suit to enforce the improvement liens. The trial court adjudged that the property of T. W. Vaughn was assessable as a unit, and this appeal challenges the correctness of that ruling.

The facts are these: In the year 1909 there was laid off and platted into lots the De Laney &…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Davis v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. City of Mount Sterling v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Pursiful v. City of HarlanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Burnside Land Co. v. Connelly and LeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Paducah v. GillispieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Doolittle v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Monticello Electric Light Co. v. City of MonticelloCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  4. Lee v. City of Park HillsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  5. Becker v. ConnDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API