Legal Opinion
Pursiful v. City of Harlan
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided January 20, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Drury, Commissioner
Affirming*.
B. Gr. Pursiful is seeking* to reverse a judgment by which, the city of Harlan, for the use and benefit of Owen Kelly and E. S. Forester, street contractors, was adjudged to have a lien for the sum of $1,491.15, with interest, upon two lots belonging to Pursiful, situated on Mountain View avenue in the city of Harlan. H. C. •Slemp and Eunice Slemp Flannery are seeking to reverse a judgment by which the city of Harlan, for the use and benefit of Kelly and Forester, contractors, was adjudged to have a lien for $879.10, with interest, upon…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Layman v. BeelerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Ewing v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- City of Owensboro v. HopeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Becker v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co. v. WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Vaughn v. City of WilliamsburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- City of Hazard v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- City of Mount Sterling v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Lewis v. LindsleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.