Legal Opinion

Davis v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 13, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*829Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming on cross appeal and reversing on original appeal.

R. W. Davis & Company, the contractors, and the city of Pineville brought this suit against J. H. McDonald to enforce a street improvement lien on certain lots owned by him. It is conceded that all the proceedings of the city council were regular, and that the work was satisfactorily performed and accepted by the city, but certain questions were raised and decided in a judgment from which the contractors and city have appealed and the property owner has prosecuted a cross appeal.(1) The first ruling…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co. v. WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Vaughn v. City of WilliamsburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Thompson v. City of WilliamsburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. City of Hazard v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. City of Mount Sterling v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API