Legal Opinion

Prezioso v. Aerts

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 4, 2014No. 2013AP2762PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, J.

¶ 1. Dennis and Penny Aerts appeal a judgment reforming a recorded Road Maintenance Declaration (the Declaration) to which their predecessors in interest were parties. Following a bench trial, the circuit court concluded the Declaration established an easement over a private road traversing the Aertses1 property. It reformed the agreement to include legal descriptions of other properties adjoining the private road that were mistakenly omitted.

¶ 2. On appeal, the Aertses' primary argument is that the Declaration's description of the easement is insufficient to satisfy the statute of frauds,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Waushara County v. GrafWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kernz v. J. L. French Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  3. Wiegand v. GissalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Klein-Dickert Oshkosh v. Frontier Mortgage Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Kuester v. RowlandsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Charles Bich v. WW3 LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
  2. Boyd, Ivan v. KussmaulDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2023
  3. Charles Bich v. WW3 LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
  4. Krause v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  5. MPI Wright LLC v. Goodin CompanyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API