Beverly Maeker v. William Ross (072185)
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin
In Kozlowski v. Kozlowski, this Court for the first time recognized the enforceability of a palimony agreement against a person who promised to provide future support to a partner with whom he shared a marital-type relationship. 80 N.J. 378, 384-85, 403 A.2d 902 (1979). A palimony agreement is a contract, and as we explained, palimony agreements are usually oral because “ ‘parties entering this type of relationship usually do not record their understanding in specific legalese.’ ” In re Estate of Roccamonte, 174 N.J. 381, 389, 808 A.2d 838 (2002) (alterations omitted) (quoting Kozlowski,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- State v. ProfaciSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Kozlowski v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Michael J. Thieme v. Bernice F. Aucoin-Thieme(076683)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- Karen K. Johnson v. Roselle Ez Quick, Llc(075044)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- State v. Brandon Morrison(076379)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- Anthony C. Major v. Julie Maguire(074345)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- State v. PinkstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.