Legal Opinion

Beverly Maeker v. William Ross (072185)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 25, 2014No. A-1-13PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

In Kozlowski v. Kozlowski, this Court for the first time recognized the enforceability of a palimony agreement against a person who promised to provide future support to a partner with whom he shared a marital-type relationship. 80 N.J. 378, 384-85, 403 A.2d 902 (1979). A palimony agreement is a contract, and as we explained, palimony agreements are usually oral because “ ‘parties entering this type of relationship usually do not record their understanding in specific legalese.’ ” In re Estate of Roccamonte, 174 N.J. 381, 389, 808 A.2d 838 (2002) (alterations omitted) (quoting Kozlowski,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. State v. ProfaciSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  5. Kozlowski v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Michael J. Thieme v. Bernice F. Aucoin-Thieme(076683)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  2. Karen K. Johnson v. Roselle Ez Quick, Llc(075044)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  3. State v. Brandon Morrison(076379)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  4. Anthony C. Major v. Julie Maguire(074345)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  5. State v. PinkstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API