Legal Opinion
Joint School District No. 4 v. Bailey-Marsh Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1923PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
The defendants earnestly contend that the plaintiff breached the contract by failing and refusing to pay the February and March, 1918, estimates. That part of the specifications material is as follows:
“Once in each and every month during the progress of the work the owners shall pay to the contractor a sum equal to ninety per cent, of the value of the work done and material furnished during the preceding month as assessed by the architects, and the balance thirty days after the completion and acceptance of the building according to this specification.”
The question is, Was the material which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Smith v. . MollesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Builders Lumber & Supply Co. v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
- Gilette v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Webster v. LuckowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Salt Lake City v. O'ConnorUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. GatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- State v. ThomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Rance v. GaddisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.