Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Allred

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1934No. 6686PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge CRITZ

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

This is an original mandamus proceeding instituted by the City of Houston, Texas, as relator, against Honorable James V. Allred, Attorney General of Texas, as respondent, to compel him to approve the transcript relating to the issuance of $2,-502,000.00 worth of City of Houston Water Works Revenue Bonds. James W. and Henry M. Rockwell, individually, and as independent executors of the J. M. Rockwell estate, and J. H. Pittman and E. D. Holt are made parties as co-respondents. The presence herein of the co-respondents…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. City of Dayton v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. City of Fort Worth v. BobbittTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Jackson v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. American Grocery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Texas National Guard Armory Board. v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Lower Colorado River Authority v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Texas Turnpike Authority v. ShepperdTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Hidalgo County Water Improvement District No. 2 v. BlalockTexas Supreme Court · 1957

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API