Legal Opinion
In Re Wenzel
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 1, 2009No. 08-13232PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT E. NUGENT, Chief Bankruptcy Judge.
The chapter 13 trustee objects to confirmation of debtors’ chapter 13 plan and contends that debtors are not providing all of their projected disposable income to pay unsecured creditors as required by 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B). 1 More specifically, the trustee objects to debtors’ claimed $489 deduction for vehicle ownership expense on Official Form 22C, line 28. 2 The debtors’ 2001 Pontiac Firebird is unencumbered and paid for. This claimed deduction impacts the calculation of debtors’ projected disposable income.
This case was…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Haynes v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- In Re David L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Plotner v. AT & T Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re RodriguezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Timothy v. Anderson (In Re Timothy)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- In Re SislerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2012
- In re: Laura Lynne Dugas; Laura Kelly Dugas v. Stephen Natelson; Law Offices of Stephen Natelson; Ike GallegosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2026
- Sandra Joyce McGrath and Dale Allen RogersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.