In Re Sisler
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ROSS W. KRUMM, Bankruptcy Judge.
The matter before the Court for decision is the Debtors’ motion for confirmation of their Chapter 13 plan. The Trustee has objected to confirmation on the basis that the Debtors’ plan does not provide for all of the Debtors’ projected disposable income to be paid to the Debtors’ unsecured creditors. 1 The only issue in contention is whether the $688 expense listed on line 27A of the Debtors’ Form B 22C is proper. 2
Facts
The Debtors filed them Chapter 13 petition and their proposed plan on April 20, 2011. The Debtors own three vehicles—a 2005…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Babin v. Wilson (In Re Wilson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- In Re CarlinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2006
- In Re RansomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re SiresUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2014
- In re: Michael J. Luedtke and Katherine L. LuedtkeUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- In re JacksonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
- In re: Michael J. Luedtke and Katherine L. LuedtkeUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- In re: Michael J. Luedtke and Katherine L. LuedtkeUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014