Legal Opinion

Timothy v. Anderson (In Re Timothy)

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 29, 2010No. UT-10-003, 08-28332PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNISH, Chief Judge.

In this above-median income Chapter 13 case, the debtors appeal the bankruptcy court’s order confirming a plan that includes Social Security income as part of projected disposable income for plan payment purposes and requires payments for an applicable commitment period of five years. The debtors agreed to the terms of the plan under protest, but reserved their right to appeal. Having reviewed the record and applicable law, we affirm the bankruptcy court’s order.

I. BACKGROUND FACTS

The relevant facts are not disputed by the parties. 1 Orin A. Timothy and Karen D.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baud v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. Webb v. Isaacson (In re Isaacson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  3. O & S Trucking, Inc. v. Mercedes Benz Financial Services USACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  4. In Re ArlenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2011
  5. In Re HargisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API