Legal Opinion

State v. Deptula

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 5, 1994No. 12093PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The state of Connecticut appeals1 from the. judgment rendered by the trial court granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss the information charging him with violation of probation under General Statutes § 53a-32.2 The state argues that the trial court improperly concluded that § 53a-32 does not authorize *3the revocation of probation for criminal acts committed after sentencing but prior to the commencement of the probationary period, even when the arrest warrant is issued after the commencement of probation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The facts are not disputed. In May, 1990,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Payne v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. State v. RobersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. Shays v. Local Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. MorganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. State v. RollinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. State v. StricklandConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. State v. ThorpConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. State v. BostwickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API