Legal Opinion
State v. Strickland
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 3, 1996No. 14593PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) found him to be in violation of probation because there was insufficient evidence, (2) failed to disqualify itself, (3) denied him the right personally to address the court, (4) deprived him of his right to counsel, and (5) refused to order an updated presentence investigation report. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts adduced at the probation hearing are relevant to this appeal. On November 17, 1988, the defendant pleaded…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. StricklandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. GauthierConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. McDuffieConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. OliverConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.