Legal Opinion

United States Casualty Co. v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1935No. 25064PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Since the casualty company paid the major part of the judgment rendered against its own assured and the assured of the indemnity company jointly, it invokes the equitable doctrine of contribution ordinarily applicable to co-sureties. It seeks to recover from the indemnity company, by way of contribution, the latter’s proportionate share of the amount paid by the casualty company to fully satisfy the judgment. Before the casualty company can invoke the doctrine of contribution it must show that both it and the indemnity company entered into a co-surety relationship whereby each agreed to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Royan Indemnity Co. v. BeckerOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Frost v. LowryOhio Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. TrowbridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Globe Indemnity Co. v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Wery v. SeffOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Bolton v. ZieglerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
  5. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. Dingle-Clark Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API