Wery v. Seff
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
The initial complaint of the defendants, appellants herein, is that the Court of Appeals committed prejudicial error in overruling their motion to dismiss the appeal. .When the trial court sustained the demurrers to the petition, thus depriving plaintiff of the advantages of pursuing the alleged tort-feasOrs jointly, and then dismissed the petition, a final order affecting substantial rights resulted, and was reviewable within the principles announced by this court in Grimm v. Modest, 135 Ohio St., 275, 20 N. E. (2d), 527.
Next, it is contended that the Court of Appeals erred in holding the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Elliott v. HardinsOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- Taylor v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Lutfy v. LockhartArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Royan Indemnity Co. v. BeckerOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Rush v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Huston v. KoniecznyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Gulla v. StrausOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Williamson v. Eclipse Motor Lines, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Federal ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Hardwick Ex Rel. Bartz v. BublitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.