Royan Indemnity Co. v. Becker
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The primary question presented by the record in this case is whether an indemnitor of one of two joint tort-feasors may upon full payment by such indemnitor of the judgment rendered in favor of the person injured by the joint negligence of said two parties take an assignment of said judgment and thereafter enforce contribution by the non-indemnified tort-feasor. This question may be subdivided as follows:
1. Is there a right of contribution between joint tort-feasors whose joint or concurrent negligence resulted in a joint liability for damages?
2. Has the indemnitor who pays the judgment any…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Adams v. White Bus LineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- City of Tacoma v. BonnellWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Doles v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- City of Louisville v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Sharon Hageman, Admx. Of the Estate of Donald Hageman v. Signal L. P. Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. TrowbridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 1944
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.