Legal Opinion
United States v. Clark
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided May 4, 1981No. 39,042; CM 438569PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
2Per curiam
At his general court-martial1 held in Germany, the appellant was represented by a civilian defense counsel, Mr. Samuel G. Cohen of Maine. An assigned trial defense counsel also served, though the record shows that the active representation at all trial stages was performed by the civilian attorney. The record further reveals no attempt to serve Mr. Cohen (despite the availability of his address) with the post-trial review; however, it was served on the detailed military counsel who made no response. By affidavit, Mr. Cohen stated to the court below that he expected to…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. IversonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. JeanbaptisteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. EdwardsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. GnibusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. HultgrenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. KhanUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. SherrodU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982