Legal Opinion

Wagner Spray Tech Corp., Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 4, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-64; Court 04-00521PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLACH, Judge.

I

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Rule 56 Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, Wagner Spray Tech Corporation, Inc. (‘Wagner”) challenges the United States Customs and Border Protection’s (“Customs”) classification of its imported merchandise under Heading 9603 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2003) (“HTSUS”) as “paint rollers” and “paint pads” at a duty rate of 7.5% or 4% ad valorem, respectively. Plaintiff contends that the subject merchandise is properly classified at…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Applied Biosystems, Div. of Applera v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  2. CamelBak Products, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API