Legal Opinion
In Re Hamm
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 2005No. SB-04-0079-MPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Chief Justice.
¶ 1 James Hamm petitioned this Court, pursuant to Arizona Supreme Court Rule 36(g), 17A A.R.S., 1 to review the recommendation of the Committee on Character and Fitness (the Committee) that his application for admission to the State Bar of Arizona (the Bar) be denied. Having reviewed the record and the Committee’s report, we conclude that James Hamm has failed to establish the good moral character necessary to be admitted to the practice of law in Arizona and deny his application.
I
¶ 2 In September 1974, James Hamm was twenty-six years old and living on the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Super. Ct. in & for Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- In re CogginSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
- In Re KingArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- In re SheaSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
- In the Matter of Richard B. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.