Legal Opinion

Cleveland Trust Co v. Willis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1985No. 84-1766PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court correctly ruled that the signatory status of the parties was conclusively established by Cleveland Trust’s requests for admissions. We hold that the trial court was correct in that ruling.

Civ. R. 36 requires that when requests for admissions are filed by a party, the opposing party must timely respond either by objection or answer. Failure to respond at all to the requests will result in the requests becoming admissions. Under compelling circumstances, the court may allow untimely replies to avoid the admissions.

In the instant case,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Balson v. DoddsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. BattleOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Buckeye Union Insurance v. McGrawCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 1980
  4. Buckeye Union Insurance v. Regional Transit AuthorityCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 1983

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Bayview Loan Servicing, L.L.C. v. St. CyrOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Klesch v. ReidOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Youssef v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Ramos v. KhawliOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Kutscherousky v. Integrated Comm. Sol., Unpublished Decision (8-15-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API