Legal Opinion

Balson v. Dodds

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1980No. 79-1385PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.

The trial court denied appellant’s motion for summary judgment because it determined that, pursuant to Civ. R. 36, appellee’s failure to file timely answers *289to appellant’s Requests for Admissions did not constitute a proper basis for summary judgment. On appeal, the Court of Appeals did not consider the trial court’s disposition under Civ. R. 36 because it ruled that a trial court’s denial of a motion for summary judgment is non-reviewable on appeal by the movant from a subsequent adverse final judgment. We affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals for reason that the trial court properly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State, ex rel. Overmeyer v. WalinskiOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Robert Allen French v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. WhittingtonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Celebrezze v. NetzleyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Cleveland Trust Co v. WillisOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. French v. DwigginsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Johnson v. RothsteinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API