Legal Opinion
Buckeye Union Insurance v. Regional Transit Authority
City of Cleveland Municipal Court
Decided January 19, 1983No. 82 CV E 098076PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdrine, J.
This is an action for property damage allegedly arising out of a collision between an automobile owned by Alexander & Alexander and a Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority bus operated by Bridgette Pruitt.
Plaintiff, Buckeye Union Insurance Company (hereinafter “Buckeye”), asserts that it is the assignee and subrogee of Alexander & Alexander, and brings this action as the real party in interest under the provisions of Civ. R. 17(A).
The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (hereinafter “RTA”) and Pruitt are named as codefendants. Certified mail service was obtained on RTA on May…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. BattleOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Bilikam v. BilikamOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Lash v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Normali v. Cleveland Ass'n of Life UnderwritersOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cleveland Trust Co v. WillisOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Tucker v. McQueryClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 1999