Legal Opinion

Buckeye Union Insurance v. McGraw

City of Cleveland Municipal Court

Decided May 5, 1980No. 79 CV E 2508PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

This is an action in tort arising out of an automobile collision. The plaintiffs have served 10 requests for admissions on defendant. Defendant, who admitted request Nos. 3 and 5, responded to the remainder with the words “lack of knowledge,” and nothing more.

In pertinent part, Civ. R. 36(A) provides:

“ * * * An answering party may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless he states that he has made reasonable inquiry and that the information known or readily obtainable by him is insufficient to enable him to admit or deny. * * *
“The party who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. BattleOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Schmelzer v. FarrarOhio Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cleveland Trust Co v. WillisOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. MasonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Buckeye Union Insurance v. Regional Transit AuthorityCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API