Legal Opinion
Buckeye Union Insurance v. McGraw
City of Cleveland Municipal Court
Decided May 5, 1980No. 79 CV E 2508PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.
This is an action in tort arising out of an automobile collision. The plaintiffs have served 10 requests for admissions on defendant. Defendant, who admitted request Nos. 3 and 5, responded to the remainder with the words “lack of knowledge,” and nothing more.
In pertinent part, Civ. R. 36(A) provides:
“ * * * An answering party may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless he states that he has made reasonable inquiry and that the information known or readily obtainable by him is insufficient to enable him to admit or deny. * * *
“The party who…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. BattleOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Schmelzer v. FarrarOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cleveland Trust Co v. WillisOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. MasonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Buckeye Union Insurance v. Regional Transit AuthorityCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 1983