Rutland v. P. H. Ruebel Company
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtG-reenhaw, J.
The appellee in this case, a corporation, was engaged in the undertaking business in the city of Little Rock, its sole stockholders, officers, and directors being Alfred Leymer, his wife and his sister-in-law, Miss Ruebel. Leymer was secretary-treasurer and manager. The appellant was employed as an embalmer fox-appellant by Mr. Leymer iix 1925. At that time another employee, Carl Yess, was assistaxxt manager. Ixx 1928 the said Cax-1 Vess became totally disabled due to illxxess, which terminated his services for appellee. Thereupon the duties of Vess were delegated to the appellant.
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Minnis v. FriendIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
- Illinois Central Railroad v. O'KeefeIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Pienta v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Carpenter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Hogue v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harlan v. CurboSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Wright v. CoveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Baxter v. Grobmyer Bros.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Weatherford v. WommackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Waganer v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.