Legal Opinion

Waganer v. Travelers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided July 9, 1980No. CA 80-22PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Judge.

This case presents the question whether a trial judge may honor the request of jurors that an exhibit which contains a portion of an instruction be given to them without giving them all of their instructions. We have found no Arkansas cases which deal with this specific problem. However, we were able to say the case should be reversed because we find the trial judge’s act in giving the jurors part of an instruction contained in an exhibit had the effect of placing undue emphasis upon that portion, and emphasis of that sort has been held to constitute error.

The appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gambill v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Wright v. CoveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  3. Rutland v. P. H. Ruebel CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  4. Huddleston v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  5. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brasher v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1991
  2. Oliver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Oliver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API