Legal Opinion

Harlan v. Curbo

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 10, 1971No. 5-5526PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The three plaintiff-appellants, Billy N. Harlan, his wife, Cherry Harlan, and their five-year-old son, Robert Harlan, brought this action for personal injuries and property damage sustained when their car ran into the back of a car being driven by the minor appellee, Jan Curbo. The collision occurred on Highway 33 at a point several miles south of Augusta. It was the plaintiffs’ theory that Curbo negligently backed out of a driveway onto the highway and had just started moving forward when his vehicle was struck from behind by the oncoming Harlan car.

The case was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Reese v. HaywoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. Smith v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  5. Rutland v. P. H. Ruebel CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fischer v. MooreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Carnation Company v. WongTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Taplin Ex Rel. Taplin v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  5. Potts v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API