Samsel v. Allstate Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRUKE, Judge.
¶ 1 This appeal asks us to determine whether the medical payments coverage of an automobile insurance policy issued by Allstate Insurance Company covers accident-related health care expenses of its insured, Lisa Samsel, even though most of the expenses were covered by her health care services organization (HMO). Based on the following undisputed facts, we conclude that the policy covers those expenses.
¶ 2 Lisa sustained injuries in an automobile accident and was taken by ambulance to University Medical Center (UMC), where she received medical care and signed a “Conditions…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Black v. American Bankers Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Irwin v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Samsel v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Velasco v. Security National Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Rigoli v. 44 Monroe Marketing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Grunwald v. Scottsdale HealthcareCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- Ormsby v. Nexus RVs, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.