Legal Opinion

Rigoli v. 44 Monroe Marketing, LLC

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 9, 2014No. 1 CA-CV 12-0587PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 This appeal arises from an unsuccessful project to construct and sell condominium units in Phoenix. Defendant/Appellant 44 Monroe Marketing, LLC (“Marketing”) challenges the summary judgment granted to Plaintiffs/Appellees — condominium purchasers — that recognized the validity and priority of Plaintiffs’ vendees’ liens. Several questions are presented. Did Plaintiffs acquire equitable vendees’ liens — to secure the return of their earnest money and down payments in the event of default — by entering into purchase contracts with the developer-seller and making…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,654 William L. Gunter and Camille S. Gunter v. Theodore M. HutchesonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Richard M. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. City of Tucson v. KoerberArizona Supreme Court · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hogue v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. Advanced Property Tax Liens, Inc. v. Jorge OthonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  3. MRI Saddlehorn Riviera Investment Fund LLC v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API