Legal Opinion

Shin v. Ahn

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2007No. S146114PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

In Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296 [11 Cal.Rptr.2d 2, 834 P.2d 696] (Knight), we considered the duty of care that should govern the liability of sports participants. We recognized that careless conduct by coparticipants is an inherent risk in many sports, and that holding participants liable for resulting injuries would discourage vigorous competition. Accordingly, those involved in a sporting activity do not have a duty to reduce the risk of harm that is inherent in the sport itself. They do, however, have a duty not to increase that inherent risk. (See Avila v.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  4. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Hayes v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Rosencrans v. Dover Images, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P.California Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Minish v. Hanuman FellowshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API