Legal Opinion

Rosencrans v. Dover Images, Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 2011No. E049899PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1076Opinion

MILLER, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Jerid and Amy Rosencrans (plaintiffs) sued defendant and respondent Dover Images, Ltd. (Dover), for (1) negligence; (2) negligent training and supervision; and (3) loss of consortium. The trial court granted Dover’s motion for summary judgment as to all of the causes of action. Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment because they presented triable issues of fact. We affirm in part, and reverse in part.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. Facts

Dover does business as Starwest Motocross, and operates a motocross track…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
  4. City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Eastburn v. Regional Fire Protection AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P.California Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Frittelli, Inc. v. 350 North Canon Drive, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Anderson v. Fitness International, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Donahue v. Ledgends, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Cole v. Town of Los GatosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API