Rosencrans v. Dover Images, Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1076Opinion
MILLER, J.
Plaintiffs and appellants Jerid and Amy Rosencrans (plaintiffs) sued defendant and respondent Dover Images, Ltd. (Dover), for (1) negligence; (2) negligent training and supervision; and (3) loss of consortium. The trial court granted Dover’s motion for summary judgment as to all of the causes of action. Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment because they presented triable issues of fact. We affirm in part, and reverse in part.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. Facts
Dover does business as Starwest Motocross, and operates a motocross track…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Eastburn v. Regional Fire Protection AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P.California Supreme Court · 2012
- Frittelli, Inc. v. 350 North Canon Drive, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Anderson v. Fitness International, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Donahue v. Ledgends, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Cole v. Town of Los GatosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.