Legal Opinion

Lukens v. Ridley Township Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1951No. Appeal, 87PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

This is an appeal in. a mandamus proceeding from an order of the Court of the Common Pleas of Delar ware County. Petitioners (appellees) requested the Board of Adjustment to grant a special exception or ■variance — they erroneously used the terms interchangeably and synonymously — changing, reclassifying or re-designating “Business” * 1.66 acres of their 20 acre tract of real estate, known as Tract No. 1, “now classified ‘A residence’ in part and ‘B residence’ in part”; and approximately .29 acres, known as Tract No. 3, “noAV classified as ‘A residence’ in part and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Kline v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Bray v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Lord AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API