Lukens v. Ridley Township Zoning Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bell,
This is an appeal in. a mandamus proceeding from an order of the Court of the Common Pleas of Delar ware County. Petitioners (appellees) requested the Board of Adjustment to grant a special exception or ■variance — they erroneously used the terms interchangeably and synonymously — changing, reclassifying or re-designating “Business” * 1.66 acres of their 20 acre tract of real estate, known as Tract No. 1, “now classified ‘A residence’ in part and ‘B residence’ in part”; and approximately .29 acres, known as Tract No. 3, “noAV classified as ‘A residence’ in part and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Kline v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Bray v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Lord AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.