Legal Opinion

Charles H. Grahl v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 17, 1964No. 163-62PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

We have before us in this case a retired Army officer who has performed more than 20 years of active Federal service. A ruling of the Comptroller General has deprived him of any retirement credit for the last five years of that service, and he has sued to reverse the effects of that ruling.

On June 30, 1955, plaintiff was retired as a Brigadier General in the U. S. Army Reserve. He was then entitled to receive retired pay under Title III of the Army and Air Force Vitalization and Retirement Equalization Act of 1948. 1 *Title III provides for the so-called “point system” of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Belle C. Watman, as of the Last Will and Testament of Morris Watman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  4. Grayson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  5. Navarro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leslie D. Jamerson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. O'Keefe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Fogg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API