Legal Opinion

Bates v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 9, 1995No. 93-507CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEROW, Judge.

In this suit plaintiff Bobby L. Bates alleges that the defendant violated the applicable statutes and regulations by releasing him prematurely from active duty in the Army. This matter is now before the Court on dis-positive motions filed by the parties. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted and defendant’s dispositive motions are denied.

*52 FACTS

Unless otherwise noted, the following facts are not in dispute. In November 1963, plaintiff entered the Army as a second lieutenant and remained on active duty until June 1980 when he was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Skinner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  4. Austin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Yee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Carmichael v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Montiel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Otis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  5. Otis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API