Legal Opinion
State v. Harrell / Wilson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 2013No. CC CR060548; CA A138184; SC S059513; CC C071438CR; CA A138740; SC S059461PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*249DE MUNIZ, Justice pro tempore.
In these two criminal cases, consolidated for purposes of opinion, each defendant attempted to waive his constitutional right to a jury trial as guaranteed by Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution.1 In both cases, the trial court refused to consent to the waiver, and juries subsequently convicted each defendant of the charges against him. In State v. Harrell, 241 Or App 139, 250 P3d 1 (2011), the Court of Appeals concluded that the trial court had not abused its discretion in refusing defendant Harrell’s requested jury waiver and affirmed the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. MillsOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. PipkinOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. HightowerOregon Supreme Court · 2017
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.