Legal Opinion
Ware v. Retirement Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 1944No. Civ. 12619PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Samuel Ware, as guardian of the person and estate of Camellia A. Rosétte, petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate to compel the Retirement Board of the City and County of San Francisco to grant disability retirement benefits to Mrs. Rosette. The superior court determined that on January 11, 1933, and ever since that date, Mrs. Rosette has been a member of the retirement system; that she has been incapacitated mentally for the performance of her duties during her absence from her employment and still is so incapacitated; that she became and now is entitled to disability retirement…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Walker v. City of San GabrielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Garvin v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- La Prade v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- English v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Steen v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Bernstein v. SmutzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.