Legal Opinion

Westerland v. Argonaut Grill

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1936No. 25790. Department TwoPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action is one to recover damages by respondent because of injuries sustained by the use of excessive force by the agent of appellant in ejecting respondent from a beer parlor operated by appellant in Seattle. Appellant made timely motions for dismissal at the end of respondent’s case, at the end of all of the testimony, and for a judgment n. o. v. after judgment. Appellant made no motion for a new trial, and the evidence admitted and instructions given are of course beyond question.

Appellant, by one of its officers, admitted, in answer to interrogatories, that one Chris Reed was employed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matsuda v. HammondWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Chase v. KnabelWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. De Leon v. Doyhof Fish Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Estes v. Brewster Cigar Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Crouch v. RingerWashington Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Everett ClinicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  2. Kuehn v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. Kyreacos v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Hein v. Chrysler Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Titus v. Tacoma Smeltermen's Union Local No. 25Washington Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API