Matsuda v. Hammond
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Easterday, J., entered January 17, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action in tort.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
This action was brought by the respondent against the appellants to recover damages for personal *121injuries received in an assault and battery, committed upon the respondent’s person by the appellant John Bell.
For sometime prior to the assault, the appellant Hammond conducted a produce commission business, in the city of Tacoma. The appellant Bell was her manager, and at the time of the assault had full charge of her business, Mrs. Hammond then being away from Tacoma on a visit to the eastern states. The respondent conducted a fruit and vegetable stall in the Tacoma public market. He traded…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. Boston Ice Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Collette v. ReboriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Meehan v. MorewoodNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Johanson v. Pioneer Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Chase v. KnabelWashington Supreme Court · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kuehn v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Perry v. BeverageWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Hein v. Chrysler Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Lola Rabon v. Guardsmark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- La Lone v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1951
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.