Legal Opinion

Crouch v. Ringer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1920No. 15611PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Allen, J., entered April 24, 1919, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action in tort, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Respondent, as plaintiff, brought this action against the appellants Ringer and Mueller, as proprietors, and against appellant Pavlik, as manager of the Pacific Meat Company, alleging that, while in the store owned and conducted by appellants, on lawful business, she was assaulted by -appellant Pavlik. Prom a judgment for $200 in favor of respondent and against all three of the appellants, after a trial before the court sitting without a jury, this appeal is prosecuted.

The facts, so far as necessary to be stated here, as we gather them from the record, are substantially as follows: Respondent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howell v. WintersWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Austin v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Penn v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Ramirez v. ChavezArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Brabazon v. Joannes Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Westerland v. Argonaut GrillWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Johanson v. HuntsmanUtah Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API