Pub Utilities Comm v. Boughtonville Farmers Exg Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The facts in the instant case, however, are peculiar and the precise question presented is an open one. in Ohio.
The defendant, Edward Sta'rkey, is and for some time has been engaged in the hauling of livestock raised by various farmers surrounding Boughtonville, Huron County, Ohio, to Cleveland to be,disposed of .in the Cleveland Union Stockyards' The livestock has always been transported by him under a contract between him and the defendant The Boughtonville Farmers Exchange Company, by the terms of which the defendant Starkey acted as an independent contractor' in operating the trucks and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hissem v. GuranOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Craig v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Public Utilities Commission v. Joseph Minniear & SonsOhio Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reavley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Dairymen's Co-Operative Sales Assn. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- North Shore Fish & Freight Co. v. North Shore Business Men's Trucking Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935