Legal Opinion

Williams v. Fidelity Loan & Savings Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 19, 1925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Before entering upon a discussion of the issues involved in this litigation, it becomes necessary to pass upon the status of the Fidelity Loan and Savings Company, Incorporated, which claims to occupy the dual position of appellant and appellee, pursuant to Rule VIII of this court, which is as follows:

“In any appeal, writ of error or supersedeas, if error is perceived against any appellee or defendant, the court will consider the whole record as before them, and will reverse the proceedings, either in whole or in part, in the same manner as they would do were the appellee or defendant to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Winston v. GordonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  3. Marshall v. F. & M. Savings BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
  4. Johnson v. MerrittSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  5. Camden v. Virginia Safe Deposit & Trust Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hoehn v. CrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  2. White v. Federal Deposit Ins. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  3. Mobley v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  4. Anderson v. BundySupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  5. Cornick v. WeirSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API