Legal Opinion

Hoehn v. Crews

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1944No. 2870-2876PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuxman, Circuit Judge

This litigation had its genesis in an escrow agreement executed by the appellees with the Garber Refining Company. Under this agreement the proceeds from oil production which was in litigation were placed in escrow in the Farmers State Bank of Garber, Oklahoma, to await the outcome of the litigation. At the termination of this litigation in 1930, the escrowed funds became the property of the appellees. An investigation shortly thereafter revealed that practically all of the escrowed funds had been embezzled and dissipated. The appellees also shortly thereafter ascertained that a considerable…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Brown v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of the United States · 1937

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. Omnibank of Mantee v. United Southern BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Francis v. United Jersey BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Ernest T. Stevens, George T. Stevens v. Robert E. Lowder, Thomas LowderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API