Mobley v. Russell
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
1. The exceptions pendente lite recite that the court passed an order upon the exceptions of the defendants to the auditor’s report, approving all exceptions of fact and ordering that they be tried by a jury. The plaintiff excepts and assigns said ruling as error, upon the ground that it was contrary to law and contrary to the evidence. It is also recited that the court passed an order upon the exceptions to the auditor’s report filed by the plaintiff, overruling all the exceptions of law. The error assigned is that “said ruling was and is contrary to law.” These exceptions pendente lite do…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Wynn v. Tallapoosa County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- May v. SorrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Owens v. NicholsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. RandolphSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hecht v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. LoudermilkSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- New York Life Insurance v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Bowman v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.