In re Constitutionality of Statute Empowering Supreme Court to Promulgate Rules Regulating Pleading, Practice, & Procedure in Judicial Proceedings
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
^Wickhem, J.
The sole question under examination here is the constitutionality of sec. 251.18, Stats. This section provides that “the supreme court of the state of Wisconsin shall, by rules promulgated by it from time to time, regulate pleading, practice and procedure in judicial proceedings in all courts of Wisconsin, for the purpose of simplifying the same and of promoting the speedy determination of litigation upon its merits.” The section provides that “such rules shall not abridge, enlarge or modify the substantive rights of any litigant. Such rules shall not become effective until sixty…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. RoyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- Wintersteen v. National Cooperage & Woodenware Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.