Murray v. Sevier
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DE MENT, District Judge.
Before the court are the following Motions for Summary Judgment:
1. Plaintiff Bradley E. Murray (“Plaintiff’) submitted his Motion, for Partial Summary Judgment (“Pl.’s Mot.”) on February 2, 1998. 1 In support of his Motion, Plaintiff also filed both a Statement of Uncontroverted Facts (“Pl.’s Facts”) and a Memorandum of Law (“PL’s Br.”) on February 2, 1998. On May 6, 1998, Defendant Ray W. Scott (“Scott”) filed both a Response to Plaintiffs Statement of Uncon-troverted Facts and a Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial SchoolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Hicks v. Charles Pfizer & Co. Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2005
- Murray v. ScottDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
- Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs, Phillip Gover, Shquanebin Lone-Bentley, Jillian Pappan, and Courtney Tsotigh v. Pro Football, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.