Legal Opinion

Murray v. Sevier

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided June 8, 1999No. CIV. A. 94-D-1266-NPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DE MENT, District Judge.

Before the court are the following Motions for Summary Judgment:

1. Plaintiff Bradley E. Murray (“Plaintiff’) submitted his Motion, for Partial Summary Judgment (“Pl.’s Mot.”) on February 2, 1998. 1 In support of his Motion, Plaintiff also filed both a Statement of Uncontroverted Facts (“Pl.’s Facts”) and a Memorandum of Law (“PL’s Br.”) on February 2, 1998. On May 6, 1998, Defendant Ray W. Scott (“Scott”) filed both a Response to Plaintiffs Statement of Uncon-troverted Facts and a Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial SchoolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
  3. Hicks v. Charles Pfizer & Co. Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2005
  4. Murray v. ScottDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
  5. Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs, Phillip Gover, Shquanebin Lone-Bentley, Jillian Pappan, and Courtney Tsotigh v. Pro Football, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API