Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Charles Pfizer & Co. Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided September 29, 2005No. 6:04-cv-00201PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, District Judge.
Pending before the court is Defendants Charles Pfizer & Company Inc., Pfizer, Ltd., and Pfizer Inc.’s (collectively, “Pfizer”) Motion for Summary Judgment (# 126). Pfizer seeks summary judgment on Plaintiffs Karen Hicks and Benny Hicks’s (“the Hicks”) personal injury action asserting claims for products liability, negligence, fraud, and breach of warranty, arising out of Karen Hicks’s (“Karen”) ingestion of oral polio vaccine (“OPV”). The Hicks contend that the vaccine caused Karen to develop two, non-malignant, brain tumors. Having reviewed the…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2007
- Burgess v. Balt. Police Dep'tDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Goodwin v. FawkesSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
- United States v. HabteyesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.